Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Guide

Lit Review Structure

Literature Review Structure with 5 Divisions Introduction Statement of Objective Method Discussion Conclusion

Literature Reviews can be short and concise, or they can be comprehensive and extremely detailed.


Set up a framework for your reader, so everyone is starting from the same point as you begin your topic discussion and review. Set the stage.

  • Identify the problem.
  • Define special terms & clarify acronyms.
  • Briefly explain theories.
  • Justify the relevancy or importance of the topic, issue, condition.
  • Provide background information: geography, dates, names, events, etc.
  • Give a short history of the topic to place it in historical context.


  • State your purpose. Why review the literature?
  • Tell the reader what to expect from the review.
  • Make a claim.
  • State the question.


  • Identify a time frame to circumscribe the literature to be examined. 
            *last 10 years        *2015-2020        *1982-2019
  • Identify the language used in the literature to be examined.
            *English only        *English & Spanish
  • Identify formats the literature can take.
            *RCTs only        *quantitative studies only        *no editorials or social media, etc.
  • Identify population characteristics necessary in research studies:
            *Hispanics        * > 65 yrs        *female 
  • Identify the search tools to be employed.
            *List databases        *Google Scholar        *Bibliographies, etc.
  • Identify search TERMS.
            *keywords       *controlled vocabulary (MeSH, Subject Headings)       
            * synonyms -- plain language, formal terminology, technical terminology
  • Develop the search strategy using Boolean Operators (AND, OR)
  • Document each search (search terms, Boolean Operators, filters, number of results, date searched)
  • Analyze search results as representative of the Review Objective (answers the question)
  • Modify the search strategy if necessary. Document
  • Describe final search results.
            *surprises        *unique findings        *bothersome discoveries        *amount of literature on the topic, etc.

DISCUSSION:   (the heart of the Literature Review; spend the majority of time on this section)

  • Analyze the search results -- one result at a time. 
  • Summarize main findings.
  • Identify themes.
  • Address points of disagreement.
  • Note unexpected issues with the search or in the literature results themselves.
  • Discuss the quantity of high-quality literature on the topic (scarce, plentiful).
  • Assess the quality of the literature.
            *unscientific        *mostly opinion        *rigorous research        *biased, etc.


  • Summarize the main points in your findings.
  • Explain what the findings mean. Put the findings in context. How do the findings fit with previous knowledge?
  • Address implications of what was discovered (for practice, for the future, etc.)
  • Forecast future trends or new areas of exploration.
  • Make recommendations.
    (Do not bring new information into your conclusion. This section is the ultimate take-away message ... bottom line.)